top of page

Creating Space for Communication: Helping Your Child Initiate

Updated: Jan 11


This post explores why children’s attempts to initiate communication are so important for language development. It explains how pausing, observing, and responding to a child’s signals creates more opportunities for connection and learning. It focuses on everyday support, includes guidance for AAC users, and acknowledges that some children follow different language pathways, including Gestalt language development.


Child pointing to something on a tablet while woman smiles warmly on a bed. Bright room with white walls and plants, creating a cozy atmosphere.


If your child isn’t using many words yet, it can feel reassuring to step in quickly to anticipate needs, fix problems, or offer what you know they want before frustration builds.

Parents become incredibly skilled at this. You learn your child’s routines, signals, and preferences so well that you can often respond before they even need to ask.
But when it comes to communication development, this well-meaning instinct can sometimes reduce opportunities for children to initiate communication themselves and initiation matters.

What does “initiating” mean?

Initiation simply means your child starting an interaction, rather than responding to one.

This might look like:
  • Looking between you and something they want
  • Pointing
  • Handing you an object
  • Making a sound or vocalisation
  • Using a gesture, sign, AAC symbol, or word
  • Moving closer or pulling you towards something

Initiation does not require spoken words.
Any attempt to get your attention counts and these attempts are the foundation for later language development.

Why initiation is so important

Research consistently shows that children learn language best through back-and-forth interaction, especially when communication starts with the child’s interests.

When children initiate:
  • They create opportunities for joint attention
  • Adults are more likely to respond in meaningful, relevant ways
  • Language is easier to map onto real experiences
  • Motivation and engagement increase

Children who initiate more often tend to receive richer, more responsive language input, which supports both understanding and expression over time.
In contrast, when adults do most of the initiating, children may have fewer chances to practise signalling, requesting, or sharing attention even though the interaction feels supportive on the surface.

Anticipation vs opportunity

Anticipating your child’s needs is not wrong. It’s part of being a responsive caregiver.

The goal isn’t to stop helping it’s to pause just long enough to allow your child a chance to communicate first.

For example:
  • Opening a snack before your child has a chance to signal
  • Fixing a toy immediately when it stops working
  • Refilling a cup as soon as it’s empty

In these moments, a brief pause can turn a routine interaction into a communication opportunity.

A simple strategy: pause and observe
You don’t need to engineer situations or withhold things to create communication.
Instead, try this gentle shift:
  1. Pause for a few seconds
  2. Watch what your child does
  3. Notice how they try to get your attention

Ask yourself:
  • Do they look at me?
  • Do they point or reach?
  • Do they make a sound or facial expression?

Once your child initiates — in any way — you can respond.
This pause helps you learn how your child currently communicates and creates space for them to practise initiating again.

What to do when your child initiates

When your child initiates, your response matters more than the form of their communication.
Helpful responses usually include:
  • Acknowledging the attempt
  • Responding promptly
  • Adding simple, relevant language
For example:
  • Child reaches for bubbles → “Bubbles! More bubbles.”
  • Child looks at the cupboard → “Snack. You want snack.”
  • Child points outside → “Car. Big car.”

This turns initiation into a language-learning moment without pressure.

Initiation for AAC users

For children who use AAC, initiation is just as important and sometimes easier to support.
Initiation might look like:
  • Touching a symbol
  • Bringing a device to you
  • Looking expectantly
  • Using a gesture alongside AAC

Pausing allows children time to access their system and decide what they want to communicate.

Adults can support this by:
  • Waiting without rushing
  • Responding to all communication attempts
  • Modelling relevant words on the AAC system during real interactions

AAC does not replace initiation — it enables it.

Initiation for Gestalt language processors

Children who are Gestalt language processors may initiate using:
  • Scripts
  • Song lines
  • Familiar phrases

These initiations are meaningful, even if they don’t sound context-specific.

Supporting initiation here involves:
  • Responding to the intent behind the phrase
  • Joining the interaction without correcting
  • Modelling short, meaningful language that fits the moment

For example:
  • Child says a familiar phrase when they want help → “Help. Help coming.”

The goal is participation, not precision.

What if my child doesn’t initiate at all?

Some children initiate less often because:
  • They are still building joint attention
  • Communication feels effortful
  • They’ve learned adults will step in quickly
  • They are overwhelmed or dysregulated

This doesn’t mean they aren’t capable it means they need more supported opportunities, not more demands.

Even very small initiations count. Over time, with consistent pauses and responsive support, these attempts often increase.

If you take one thing from this post

You don’t need to make your child talk.
You don’t need to wait in silence for long stretches.
You just need to leave a little space.
That space is where communication begins.

If you’re unsure how to support your child’s communication or would like help identifying what to focus on next, you’re welcome to get in touch. Sometimes talking things through can make the next steps feel clearer.
 

References

Barnett, S.E., Moxham, L.J., Moran, P. and Redmond, S.M. (2022) ‘Validation of a measure of parental responsiveness in a clinical context’, Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 38(1), pp. 27–45.https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493521996489

Heidlage, J.K., Cunningham, J.E., Kaiser, A.P., Trivette, C.M., Barton, E.E., Frey, J.R. and
Roberts, M.Y. (2020) ‘The effects of parent-implemented language interventions on child linguistic outcomes: A meta-analysis’, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 50, pp. 6–23.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.12.006

Levickis, P., Eadie, P., Mensah, F., McKean, C. and Reilly, S. (2023) ‘Associations between responsive parental behaviours in infancy and toddlerhood and language outcomes at age 7 years’, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 58(4), pp. 1098–1112.https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12846

Romeo, R.R., Leonard, J.A., Robinson, S.T., West, M.R., Mackey, A.P., Rowe, M.L. and Gabrieli, J.D.E. (2018) ‘Beyond the 30-million-word gap: Children’s conversational exposure is associated with language-related brain function’, Psychological Science, 29(5), pp. 700–710.https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617742725

Romski, M.A., Sevcik, R.A., Barton-Hulsey, A. and Whitmore, A.S. (2015) ‘Early intervention and AAC: What a difference 30 years makes’, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(3), pp. 181–202.https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1064163

Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists (2021) Best practice in parent–child interaction and early language development. RCSLT.
 
bottom of page